Kings David and Solomon: from 10th Century B.C.E. to Present Day Controversy

magnates David and Solomon From ordinal Century B. C. E. to present day Controersy penetration Perhaps the closely famous Old will top executives, as wholesome as two of the most famous Hebrew heroes of all while were, poof Solomon and his father world power David. Their stories have been told time and time again throughout the ages passed down orally for centuries, then later reproduced and shared all over the clump as intricate portions of umteen historical phantasmal school texts including the Torah, the Koran and the Holy Bible. Biblical sources include I Chronicles, I world powers, Ecclesiastes, as well as the accounts of some prophets.Furthermore, King David and King Solomon have been attri stilled to writing some(prenominal) Old Testament books including the Song of Solomon, Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, and various Psalms. Historically, David is know for uniting the Kingdom of Israel, replacing Hebron and making capital of Israel its capitol, as well as establish ing a dynasty that was held sanctified in the hearts and hopes of the Jews for centuries after its demise. His son and transposition Solomon is most noted for advancing Davids dry knowledge domain and for building the First Temple.In fact, according to Abba Eban (1999), author of over half a dozen historical deferred payment books on Jewish history as well as the PBS television series civilisation and the Jews, Solomons Temple was the crowning glory of a building program that rivaled those of the Pharaohs (p. 50). Archaeologists claim to have make remnants of Solomons Temple as well in the form of a tablet dated tenth century B. C. E. (Carpenter, 2003, p. 46). However, not all historians and archaeologists agree to the legitimacy of the tablet or even to the extent of King David and King Solomons rule.Recently, controversy has erupted concerning whether or not, King David and King Solomon, of the Old Testament ( in like manner known as the Jewish Bible) were actually the gra nd builders of the united mating-south monarchy in Ancient Palestine attributed to them through the Bible and utter to unravel after their demise (Halken, 2006, p. 41). The Legacies of David and Solomon match to Rogerson (1999) It is no surprise that David should be one of the most authoritative figures in the bible. As printed in the tradition his achievements were outstanding. ahead his harness Israel was a overcome vassal people. Within a few old age David do Israel free, and even lengthy his control over some small neighbouring peoples. Before his reign there was no one possessive political or religious centre in Israel. Within a few long time capital of Israel had obtained a centrality that it never subsequently lost (p. 82). David was born(p) around 1040 B. C. E. in Bethlehem, Judah (Castel, 1985, p. 87). He grew up the youngest of eighter from Decatur sons of Jesse, and has been linked with the Ammonite royal family (Rogerson, 1999, p. 78 2 Samuel, 10 1-2 1725-7).As a teenager David conjugate the entourage of Israeli King capital of Minnesota as a minstrel and harpsichord player. It was during this time point that he first gained notoriety when he defeated the ominous giant Goliath armed with a mere slingshot. In 1 Samuel 1820-30 it states that with a dowry of 200 Philistine foreskins he married King capital of Minnesotas daughter Michal. Unfortunately, Davids marital bliss was cut short by the jealousy of his new father-in-law. Already a flavour warrior David was praised as a military force with songs proclaiming Saul has slain his thousands, and David his ten thousands (Rogerson, 1999, p. 78).While fleeing Sauls armies to the south, David effected a extensive many military victories on board his former enemies the Philistines, as described in 1 Samuel. Though his military reign started as an or so nomadic band with him a robin-hood like bandit-chief, his strategical prowess was realized by the Judean elders and he was proclaim King of Judah in Hebron, c. a. 1010 (although some texts have him proclaiming himself King of Judah) (Castel, 1985, p. 89 Halkin, 2006, p. 41). He unified the Israeli tribes to the north and Judah to south and became the ruler of all of Israel seven long time later following the death of King Saul c. a. 000 B. C. E. (Castel, 1985, pp. 87-89 Grant, 1984, pp. 75-78 Learsi, 1949, pp. 49-51 Rogerson, 1999, pp. 79-80 2 Samuel, c. a. 1100-1010 B. C. E. , pp. 505-555). In a brilliant political move David took over the Jebusite city of capital of Israel and made it the capitol of the new United Kingdom of Israel thenceforward to be esteemed as the City of David (2 Samuel, 1997, pp. 505-555 Eban, 1999, p. 47). Moving the capitol to Jerusalem was an intellectual move on Davids part since it hardened him geographically between the northern tribes of Israel and the former Judah. This also unified the Hebrew state of matter politically since Jerusalem was a fresh tart, not being formerly of Isr ael or Judah. In aver to unify the nation religiously David (with the help of King Hiram of Tyre) built a palace on Mount Zion where he housed the Ark of the pledge (Castel, 1985, p. 90 Eban, 1999, p. 49 Halkin, 2006, p. 43 Learsi, 1949, p. 55 Rogerson, 1999, pp. 81-82). He then set out to expand his region taking over and taxing all of heaven (Rogerson, 1999, p. 82). King David ruled Israel for the next 33 years (Castel, 1985, p. 89 Harkin, 2006, p. 41). Unfortunately the house of David, like many great monarchs (especially those who practiced polygamy) faced great diplomatic personal odds.Among them was internal dissent including a great deal of palace intrigue that was coupled with Davids personal struggles involving subduing his strong passionate nature (1 Samuel, 1997, pp. 439-504 2 Samuel, 1997, pp. 505-555). As for Solomon, his controversial legacy began before his origin with the scandalous circumstances surrounding his parents union. His mother, Bathsheba, had been mar ried to some other man when David saw her, had her, and then had her husband come in to death by placing him on the front lines of conflict (Rogerson, 1999, p. 85). Since Bathsheba was a favorite of Davids he promised her that her son would be his successor.It took some clever maneuvering but Solomon was title King of Israel in c. a. 960 (Harkin, 2006, p. 43). Solomons reign was characterized by his diplomatic matrimonial choices, made in order to enhance his trade routes and expand his Kingdom. His first betrothal was to one of King Hirams daughters, solidifying his kinship with Tyre. This provided him with the materials necessary to build his fathers Temple. some other strategic marriage was to an Egyptian pharoahs daughter. As a dowry the pharaoh burnt down the city Gezer and gave it to Solomon.All in all Solomon had 700 wives and 300 concubines (Eban, 1984, p. 49-50). Historical and archeological Controversy In the last several years there has been an abundance of historic al and archeologic arguing over the reigns of King David and King Solomon. tally to Harkin (2006) archaeologist Israel Finkelstein and author Neil Asher Silberman state that, kings David and Solomon, though genuine historical figures were but bandit chiefs (p. 41). Finkelstein believes that Israel could not have reached its jacket during the reigns of David and Solomon in the 10th century, but rather in the 8th or 9th.Finkelsteins account relies only on the lack of archeological deduction to cut the foundation of the monumental architecture described in the biblical accounts of David and Solomon (Harkin, 2006, pp. 41-48). However, their opinion is countered by several archeologic discoveries that have occurred over the last several years, resulting in their evidence being described as tendentiouslike a conspiracy theory (Harkin, 2006, p. 48). According to Blakely (2002) two maps of tenth century BC. E. ere uncovered providing archaeological evidence of King David and King S olomons domain (p. 49). Then in 2003 a possible breakthrough discovery was made a piece of sandstone was unearthed say to be the first documented archaeological evidence of Solomons temple. Researchers at the Geological Survey of Israel examined the tablets and form them to be almost certainly genuine (Carpenter, 2003, p. 46). According to Bar-llan University archaeologist Gabrial Barkai, these tablets could be the most significant archaeological finding in yet in the land of Israel (Carpenter, 2003, p. 6). Further proof of the existence of King David and King Solomons kingdom was the amazing find of a 3000 plus structure by archaeologist Eilat Mazar which debunks Finkelsteins claim that David and Solomon were nothing but bandit chiefs (Halkin, 2006, pp. 41-48). ending The tedious process of gathering archaeological discipline certainly takes time. Not just time but a great deal of clever maneuvering, as well as ready manpower and commodious monetary resources. Even if you do have authority to dig, there is modern day architecture to be worked around.One just cannot go around up utter present day civilizations in order to analyse the existence of past civilizations. However, in the case of kings David and Solomon their existence has been proven time and time again. Backing up the biblical account is the Tel Dan Stele an Aramaic text uncovered in 1993 dated 835 B. C. E. which boasts of Hazael King of capital of Syria victory over northern Israels king Jehoram son of Ahab and southern Judahs Ahaziahu of the house of David (Halkin, 2006, p. 48).